Skip to main content.

Fraud Alert: Scam Text Messages Claiming DMV Penalties -

We have been made aware of fraudulent text messages being sent to individuals claiming to be from the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) or the court system. These messages often state that the recipient owes penalties or fees related to traffic violations or DMV infractions and may include a link or phone number to resolve the matter. 

Take these steps to reduce the chances of falling victim to a text message scam:

  • Never respond to unsolicited or suspicious texts — If you receive a message asking for personal or financial information, do not reply.
  • Verify the source — If you are unsure, always contact the DMV through official channels.
  • Call the DMV if you have concerns — The DMV customer service team is available to help you at 800-777-0133.

Please see DMV warning about fraudulent texts: https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/news-and-media/dmv-warns-of-fraudulent-te…

Jury Scam alert -

The Santa Barbara Superior Court has received complaints about individuals trying to scam members of the public by pretending to be court officers or officials. The Jury Services office of the Santa Barbara Superior Court does not call citizens to request payments for failing to appear for jury duty. California law does not permit citizens to pay a fine in lieu of jury duty. If you receive such a call simply hang up and, if the scammer persists, call your local law enforcement agency. Learn more about the recent scam warning.

Notice to Jurors:

Prospective jurors summoned for jury service can expect to receive their jury summons in postcard form. Please check your mail for a postcard with important instructions to fulfil your jury service. Visit the Jury Services page for more information.

Conservatorship of Sharon L. Robles

Case Number

22PR00144

Case Type

Conservatorship

Hearing Date / Time

Wed, 03/13/2024 - 08:30

Nature of Proceedings

First and Final Accounting and Report

Tentative Ruling

Probate Notes:

Appearances are required. 

Second Supplement finally resolves Discrepancy no. 1.  Second supplement gives the Court sufficient evidence to identify the bond transactions as purchases of interest that support a negative entry in receipts.

Supplement fails to resolve Discrepancy no. 2.  The schedule is still not code compliant, for the reason set forth twice in the probate notes. It would normally be recommended the Court surcharge the Conservator for intransigence in bringing the schedule up to code, but it is here recommended the court allow this discrepancy to exist without change, because the conservator is not requesting a fee to surcharge, and the only beneficiary of this estate has consented to the accounting.

Second Supplement finally resolves Discrepancy no. 3.  The second supplement gives the court sufficient facts to understand the transaction.

Account statements submitted resolve Discrepancy nos. 4 and 5. It is recommended the Court urge more timely filing of all future documents for review.

Was this helpful?

Yes No
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Was this helpful?