Volvo Financial Services vs Gina Wilcox, Frank Alfino and Wilco Engineering Inc
Volvo Financial Services vs Gina Wilcox, Frank Alfino and Wilco Engineering Inc
Case Number
22CV00350
Case Type
Hearing Date / Time
Wed, 09/20/2023 - 10:00
Nature of Proceedings
Plaintiff’s Motion to Determine Contractual Interest
Tentative Ruling
Peter J. Mastan, Gina Kripotos for Plaintiff
Defendants Gina Wilcox and Frank Alfino are self-represented
Defendant Wilco Engineering Inc is not represented
Issue
Plaintiff’s Motion to determine contractual interest.
Ruling
The motion is GRANTED; the Court awards interest of $19,875.32.
There is a [proposed] Order submitted that the Court intends to sign. Note: This case is also on the 11:30 am default calendar re: Volvo vs Wilco Engineering Inc.
Analysis
On July 12, 2023, the Court held a hearing on Plaintiff’s MSJ and issued a minute order granting Plaintiff’s MSJ against Wilcox and Alfino (“Minute Order”). The Minute Order provided for judgment against Wilcox and Alfino, jointly and severally, in the amount of $109,088.53 (the Deficiency Balance due and owing under the Note). The Minute Order notes that Plaintiff is probably entitled to interest, but that Plaintiff would need to make a separate motion for interest that Plaintiff claims is due and owing under the Note. (Kripotos Decl., ¶¶ 9-10, Exh. A).
On 8/28/23 Plaintiff filed a motion to set the interest. VFS requests that the Court grant this Motion and order an award to Plaintiff for contractual interest in the amount of $51,107.98 [interest at a rate of 18% per annum]; alternatively, if the Court finds that 7% is the appropriate interest rate to be applied to the Deficiency Balance, VFS requests that this Court order an award to Plaintiff for contractual interest in the amount of $19,875.32.
Supported by the Declaration of Gina Kripotes [9/28/23]; an attorney with the law firm of Dinsmore & Shohl LLP, attorneys of record for Plaintiff Volvo Financial Services (“Plaintiff”).
Supported by the Declaration of Betty Carr [8/28/23]; a Senior Bankruptcy and Litigation Specialist for Plaintiff.
Opposition
The Motion is not opposed.
The Court
7% interest is appropriate here.