Skip to main content.

Fraud Alert: Scam Text Messages Claiming DMV Penalties -

We have been made aware of fraudulent text messages being sent to individuals claiming to be from the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) or the court system. These messages often state that the recipient owes penalties or fees related to traffic violations or DMV infractions and may include a link or phone number to resolve the matter. 

Take these steps to reduce the chances of falling victim to a text message scam:

  • Never respond to unsolicited or suspicious texts — If you receive a message asking for personal or financial information, do not reply.
  • Verify the source — If you are unsure, always contact the DMV through official channels.
  • Call the DMV if you have concerns — The DMV customer service team is available to help you at 800-777-0133.

Please see DMV warning about fraudulent texts: https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/news-and-media/dmv-warns-of-fraudulent-te…

Jury Scam alert -

The Santa Barbara Superior Court has received complaints about individuals trying to scam members of the public by pretending to be court officers or officials. The Jury Services office of the Santa Barbara Superior Court does not call citizens to request payments for failing to appear for jury duty. California law does not permit citizens to pay a fine in lieu of jury duty. If you receive such a call simply hang up and, if the scammer persists, call your local law enforcement agency. Learn more about the recent scam warning.

Notice to Jurors:

Prospective jurors summoned for jury service can expect to receive their jury summons in postcard form. Please check your mail for a postcard with important instructions to fulfil your jury service. Visit the Jury Services page for more information.

Lilly Teisher vs Steven R Andrade et al

Case Number

23CV04374

Case Type

Civil Law & Motion

Hearing Date / Time

Fri, 01/10/2025 - 10:00

Nature of Proceedings

Motion: Entry of Judgment

Tentative Ruling

At a hearing on August 30, 2024, the Court sustained the demurrer by defendant Regents of the University of California (Regents), without leave to amend, to the only causes of action alleged against it. While the Court’s Minute Order specified that the complaint was dismissed as to the Regents, the formal order submitted by the Regents, and executed by the Court, did not include the dismissal. Defendant Regents has now moved for formal dismissal of plaintiff’s action against it and entry of judgment in its favor, pursuant to the terms of Code of Civil Procedure section 581(f)(1). That statute entitles Regents to dismissal of the action against it, under the current circumstances. The motion is therefore granted, and this action is ordered dismissed with respect to defendant Regents, and judgment entered in Regents favor. The Court has reviewed the proposed Judgment of Dismissal submitted by the Regents, and intends to execute it.

Was this helpful?

Yes No
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Was this helpful?