Skip to main content
Skip to main content.

Fraud Alert: Scam Text Messages Claiming DMV Penalties -

We have been made aware of fraudulent text messages being sent to individuals claiming to be from the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) or the court system. These messages often state that the recipient owes penalties or fees related to traffic violations or DMV infractions and may include a link or phone number to resolve the matter. 

Take these steps to reduce the chances of falling victim to a text message scam:

  • Never respond to unsolicited or suspicious texts — If you receive a message asking for personal or financial information, do not reply.
  • Verify the source — If you are unsure, always contact the DMV through official channels.
  • Call the DMV if you have concerns — The DMV customer service team is available to help you at 800-777-0133.

Please see DMV warning about fraudulent texts: https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/news-and-media/dmv-warns-of-fraudulent-te…

Jury Scam alert -

The Santa Barbara Superior Court has received complaints about individuals trying to scam members of the public by pretending to be court officers or officials. The Jury Services office of the Santa Barbara Superior Court does not call citizens to request payments for failing to appear for jury duty. California law does not permit citizens to pay a fine in lieu of jury duty. If you receive such a call simply hang up and, if the scammer persists, call your local law enforcement agency. Learn more about the recent scam warning.

Notice to Jurors:

Prospective jurors summoned for jury service can expect to receive their jury summons in postcard form. Please check your mail for a postcard with important instructions to fulfil your jury service. Visit the Jury Services page for more information.

Estate of Kenneth Irwin Dulany

Case Number

22PR00023

Case Type

Decedent's Estate

Hearing Date / Time

Mon, 04/15/2024 - 08:30

Nature of Proceedings

Petition for Final Distribution

Tentative Ruling

Probate Notes:

Appearances required, including, if possible, all heirs assigning their interest in the estate to Petitioner. 

The following must be filed before the hearing:

Declaration.  The Court ordered a declaration to be filed, that informs the Court of the relationships between all persons and the decedent (i.e. clarifying the information in ¶8 of the petition), and where the fractional interest in the property came from, including where the remaining interest in the property is titled.  No such declaration is on file.

Consents of grandchildren.  The Court ordered that all grandchildren of the decedent file consents to the proposed distribution.  No consents are on file.

Investigation of assignment.  The proposed distribution deviates from that dictated by the law of intestacy, due to the assignment of interest in the estate by Decedent’s surviving spouse and two surviving children. The assignments are unexplained, do not reveal the reasons for the assignment, nor appear to have been for consideration. 

Probate Code section 11604 gives this Court authority to inquire into the consideration for an assignment, transfer, or agreement before making a distribution that does not comply with the intestate distribution scheme outlined in the Probate Code. “The court has authority to examine such agreements and the circumstances surrounding their execution, determine the reasonableness of the consideration, and to assure that the agreement was not procured by duress, fraud, or undue influence.  As a result, the court may fix equitable terms for the distribution. (See Estate of Molino (2008) 165 Cal.App.4th 913.)”  (California Decedent Estate Practice (CEB 2024), §25.61.)

Was this helpful?

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.