Skip to main content.

Fraud Alert: Scam Text Messages Claiming DMV Penalties -

We have been made aware of fraudulent text messages being sent to individuals claiming to be from the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) or the court system. These messages often state that the recipient owes penalties or fees related to traffic violations or DMV infractions and may include a link or phone number to resolve the matter. 

Take these steps to reduce the chances of falling victim to a text message scam:

  • Never respond to unsolicited or suspicious texts — If you receive a message asking for personal or financial information, do not reply.
  • Verify the source — If you are unsure, always contact the DMV through official channels.
  • Call the DMV if you have concerns — The DMV customer service team is available to help you at 800-777-0133.

Please see DMV warning about fraudulent texts: https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/news-and-media/dmv-warns-of-fraudulent-te…

Jury Scam alert -

The Santa Barbara Superior Court has received complaints about individuals trying to scam members of the public by pretending to be court officers or officials. The Jury Services office of the Santa Barbara Superior Court does not call citizens to request payments for failing to appear for jury duty. California law does not permit citizens to pay a fine in lieu of jury duty. If you receive such a call simply hang up and, if the scammer persists, call your local law enforcement agency. Learn more about the recent scam warning.

Notice to Jurors:

Prospective jurors summoned for jury service can expect to receive their jury summons in postcard form. Please check your mail for a postcard with important instructions to fulfil your jury service. Visit the Jury Services page for more information.

Santa Barbara Plastic Surgery Center et al vs Michael Murphy et al

Case Number

22CV02650

Case Type

Civil Law & Motion

Hearing Date / Time

Fri, 06/07/2024 - 10:00

Nature of Proceedings

Motion Leave

Tentative Ruling

The motion of cross-complainants for leave to file a first amended cross-complaint (FACC) is granted. While cross-defendants make numerous arguments regarding the sufficiency of the proposed FACC, where the sufficiency of the amended pleading is contested, the better course of action is to permit the proposed amendment and then let the parties test its legal sufficiency in other appropriate proceedings. (See Atkinson v. Elk Corp. (2003) 109 Cal.App.4th 739, 760.) Cross-complainants shall file and serve their FACC, in substantially the same form as attached to the motion, on or before June 14, 2024.

Was this helpful?

Yes No
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Was this helpful?