Skip to main content
Skip to main content.

Fraud Alert: Scam Text Messages Claiming DMV Penalties -

We have been made aware of fraudulent text messages being sent to individuals claiming to be from the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) or the court system. These messages often state that the recipient owes penalties or fees related to traffic violations or DMV infractions and may include a link or phone number to resolve the matter. 

Take these steps to reduce the chances of falling victim to a text message scam:

  • Never respond to unsolicited or suspicious texts — If you receive a message asking for personal or financial information, do not reply.
  • Verify the source — If you are unsure, always contact the DMV through official channels.
  • Call the DMV if you have concerns — The DMV customer service team is available to help you at 800-777-0133.

Please see DMV warning about fraudulent texts: https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/news-and-media/dmv-warns-of-fraudulent-te…

Jury Scam alert -

The Santa Barbara Superior Court has received complaints about individuals trying to scam members of the public by pretending to be court officers or officials. The Jury Services office of the Santa Barbara Superior Court does not call citizens to request payments for failing to appear for jury duty. California law does not permit citizens to pay a fine in lieu of jury duty. If you receive such a call simply hang up and, if the scammer persists, call your local law enforcement agency. Learn more about the recent scam warning.

Notice to Jurors:

Prospective jurors summoned for jury service can expect to receive their jury summons in postcard form. Please check your mail for a postcard with important instructions to fulfil your jury service. Visit the Jury Services page for more information.

BaronHR West Inc vs Partners Personnel – Management Services LLC

Case Number

20CV04299

Case Type

Civil Law & Motion

Hearing Date / Time

Fri, 09/20/2024 - 10:00

Nature of Proceedings

Motion to Compel; Motions for Admissions

Tentative Ruling

Cross-complainant Partners Personnel-Management Services, LLC (Partners) named StaffLab LLC (StaffLab) as MOE 1 to its cross-complaint on April 22, 2024, and contends that StaffLab was created by Luis E. Perez and his company Baron HR West, Inc. in early 2024 to evade the permanent injunction in this case, and the consent decree from the United States Equal Opportunity Employment Commission. StaffLab’s Agent for Service of Process was served with the cross-complaint and its MOE amendment on April 24, 2024.

On May 9, 2024, Partners served StaffLab with first sets of Requests for Production of Documents, Form Interrogatories, Special Interrogatories, and Requests for Admissions. No responses were received to the discovery.

Partners served a second set of Requests for Admissions on StaffLab on June 11, 2024. No responses to the second set of Requests for Admissions were received.

Also on June 11, 2024, Partners filed a motion to deem admitted the matters set forth in the first set of Requests for Admissions it had served upon StaffLab. On July 18, 2024, Partners filed a motion to deem admitted the matters set forth in the second set of Requests for Admissions. On July 26, 2024, Partners filed a motion to compel responses to the first sets of Requests for Production of Documents, Form Interrogatories, and Special Interrogatories. None of the motions seek sanctions. All motions were set for hearing on September 20, 2024.

No oppositions have been filed to any of the motions.

The Court will grant the motions to compel responses to the Request for Production Documents, Form Interrogatories, and Special Interrogatories, and will order cross-defendant StaffLab to provide verified responses to this discovery, without objection, no later than October 18, 2024.

If StaffLab provides verified responses to the Requests for Admissions, Sets One and Two, without objection, prior to the hearing on this motion, the motions for deemed admissions will be denied as to either of the requests for which verified responses are provided.

If StaffLab fails to provide verified response to the Requests for Admissions, Sets One and Two, without objection, prior to the hearing, the motions for deemed admissions will be granted as to either of the requests for which verified responses were not provided.

Partners is ordered to give notice of this Court’s rulings on these motions.

Was this helpful?

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.