Skip to main content
Skip to main content.

Fraud Alert: Scam Text Messages Claiming DMV Penalties -

We have been made aware of fraudulent text messages being sent to individuals claiming to be from the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) or the court system. These messages often state that the recipient owes penalties or fees related to traffic violations or DMV infractions and may include a link or phone number to resolve the matter. 

Take these steps to reduce the chances of falling victim to a text message scam:

  • Never respond to unsolicited or suspicious texts — If you receive a message asking for personal or financial information, do not reply.
  • Verify the source — If you are unsure, always contact the DMV through official channels.
  • Call the DMV if you have concerns — The DMV customer service team is available to help you at 800-777-0133.

Please see DMV warning about fraudulent texts: https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/news-and-media/dmv-warns-of-fraudulent-te…

Jury Scam alert -

The Santa Barbara Superior Court has received complaints about individuals trying to scam members of the public by pretending to be court officers or officials. The Jury Services office of the Santa Barbara Superior Court does not call citizens to request payments for failing to appear for jury duty. California law does not permit citizens to pay a fine in lieu of jury duty. If you receive such a call simply hang up and, if the scammer persists, call your local law enforcement agency. Learn more about the recent scam warning.

Notice to Jurors:

Prospective jurors summoned for jury service can expect to receive their jury summons in postcard form. Please check your mail for a postcard with important instructions to fulfil your jury service. Visit the Jury Services page for more information.

Asset Capital Recovery Group LLC vs Hector Herrera

Case Number

20CV01100

Case Type

Civil Law & Motion

Hearing Date / Time

Wed, 05/01/2024 - 10:00

Nature of Proceedings

Claim of Exemption

Tentative Ruling

John Kenosian for Plaintiff

Defendant in pro per

Emails - None

RULING

Hector Herrera’s claim of exemption is DENIED.

Analysis

Claim of Exemption

Filed by Hector Herrera; reports he has a spouse – Gloria Herrera –

He reports his gross monthly income is $5,149/mo. - after taxes $4,032.32/mo.

Reports he has a 2013 Honda with equity of $13,000.

Claims Monthly living expenses of $4,530.

Claims Installment debt = $17,000.

He is willing to have $50 withheld twice a month.

Opposition

Plaintiff argues that Defendant's monthly allocation of $100.00 for clothing; $502.00 for installment payments; and $100.00 for entertainment costs seem excessive. Additionally, Defendant's monthly expenses exceed his monthly income. Plaintiff questions if Defendant is receiving another source of income not listed on his Claim of Exemption. A true and correct copy of the Employer’s Return was attached.

The underlying obligation for this judgment was a LOAN. Defendant used the LOAN to purchase goods, services and merchandise for himself and his family for his use and benefit. Plaintiff’s judgment takes priority over the other debt and expenses of the Defendant listed on the claim of exemption as the underlying obligation was monies loaned, paid out and purchases made for the use and benefit of the Defendant and his family for the necessity of life.

That the earnings claimed as exempt are not exempt.

That total amount due Plaintiff is $4,848.15

The Court’s Conclusions

Plaintiff’s argument is persuasive.

Was this helpful?

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.